[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289915998.2109.618.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:59:58 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 17:55 -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > so sched_debug_show() is apparently calling cgroup_path() with a NULL
> > cgroup. I think it's "print_task()" that is to blame, it does
> >
> > cgroup_path(task_group(p)->css.cgroup, ..
> >
> > without checking whether there _is_ any css.cgroup.
>
> Right - previously the returned task_group would be always associated
> with a cgroup. Now, it may not be.
>
> The original task_group() should be made accessible for anything that
> wants a real cgroup in the scheduler hierarchy, and called from the
> new task_group() function. Not sure what the best naming convention
> would be, maybe task_group() and effective_task_group() ?
Right, that doesn't solve the full problem though.
/proc/sched_debug should show these automagic task_groups, its just that
there's currently no way to properly name them, we can of course add
something like a name field to the struct autogroup thing, but what do
we fill it with? "autogroup-%d" and keep a sequence number for each
autogroup?
Then the below task_group_path() thing can try the autogroup name scheme
if it finds a NULL css.
Something like the below might avoid the explosion:
---
kernel/sched_debug.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_debug.c b/kernel/sched_debug.c
index 2e1b0d1..9b5560f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_debug.c
@@ -87,6 +87,19 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu,
}
#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED) && \
+ (defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) || defined(CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED))
+static void task_group_path(struct task_group *tg, char *buf, int buflen)
+{
+ /* may be NULL if the underlying cgroup isn't fully-created yet */
+ if (!tg->css.cgroup) {
+ buf[0] = '\0';
+ return;
+ }
+ cgroup_path(tg->css.cgroup, buf, buflen);
+}
+#endif
+
static void
print_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
@@ -115,7 +128,7 @@ print_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
char path[64];
rcu_read_lock();
- cgroup_path(task_group(p)->css.cgroup, path, sizeof(path));
+ task_group_path(task_group(p), path, sizeof(path));
rcu_read_unlock();
SEQ_printf(m, " %s", path);
}
@@ -147,19 +160,6 @@ static void print_rq(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, int rq_cpu)
read_unlock_irqrestore(&tasklist_lock, flags);
}
-#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED) && \
- (defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) || defined(CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED))
-static void task_group_path(struct task_group *tg, char *buf, int buflen)
-{
- /* may be NULL if the underlying cgroup isn't fully-created yet */
- if (!tg->css.cgroup) {
- buf[0] = '\0';
- return;
- }
- cgroup_path(tg->css.cgroup, buf, buflen);
-}
-#endif
-
void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
s64 MIN_vruntime = -1, min_vruntime, max_vruntime = -1,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists