[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikvcug2V70Uy7oGnO5vFZbS+DLvzP4wpysdU5uV@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:55:13 -0800
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> so sched_debug_show() is apparently calling cgroup_path() with a NULL
> cgroup. I think it's "print_task()" that is to blame, it does
>
> cgroup_path(task_group(p)->css.cgroup, ..
>
> without checking whether there _is_ any css.cgroup.
Right - previously the returned task_group would be always associated
with a cgroup. Now, it may not be.
The original task_group() should be made accessible for anything that
wants a real cgroup in the scheduler hierarchy, and called from the
new task_group() function. Not sure what the best naming convention
would be, maybe task_group() and effective_task_group() ?
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists