linux-kernel - Re: [performance bug] volanomark regression on 37-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1289921196.5169.176.camel@maggy.simson.net>
Date:	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:26:36 -0700
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
Cc:	"Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>, ncrao@...gle.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
	zheng.z.yan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [performance bug] volanomark regression on 37-rc1

On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 20:38 +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:

> Does VolanoMark is used for scheduler benchmarking? If I'm not wrong,
> I don't think it directly relates to scheduler benchmarking.

It's not generally considered to be a wonderful benchmark, but it is a
good indicator, and worth keeping an eye on IMHO.

I don't recall whether that patch works with the idle testcase without
resetting the throttle, or if it's only a bit less effective.  If it's
only a little less effective, I'd be inclined to just whack the reset as
Alex did.  Whatever is done has to prevent high frequency balancing.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/