[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CE2B37F.8050808@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:38:23 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shailabh Nagar <nagar1234@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
John stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
"jeremy.fitzhardinge" <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 4/7] taskstats: Add per task steal time accounting
On 11/16/2010 05:45 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>>> In fact, kvm seems to already have these tracepoints: kvm_exit/kvm_entry
>>> and it has a separate excplicit hypercall tracepoint as well:
>>> kvm_hypercall.
>> But the kvm tracepoints are used when Linux is the hypervisor, no? For our
>> situation that would be a tracepoint in z/VM - or the equivalent. This is
>> out of scope of this patch.
> Ah crud, you might be right.. Avi could a kvm guest generate events on
> vcpu enter/exit?
No. Hypercalls are voluntary and known, but most exits are involuntary
and unknown to the guest. Any memory access can generate a page fault,
and any host interrupt will exit the guest.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists