[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101116172013.102e06a6@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:20:13 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Matt Schulte <matts@...mtech-fastcom.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation about RS485 serial communications
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:13:22 -0600
Matt Schulte <matts@...mtech-fastcom.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> Documentation about RS485 serial communications
> >
> > I have seen hardware (kontron pmc-6l) that was capable of switching
> > between RS232, RS485 and one other standard by software.
> >
> > Is such hw common? If so, should we have standard interface?
>
> In my opinion this type of card is not that common. Generally
> speaking the achievable baud rates for this type of multi-protocol
> card are very limited because of limitations of the transceiver chips.
> It seems that most of the time people would rather have a faster
> serial port than one that does several different voltages
If there are two types in common use then thats enough to say we should
have a common interface IMHO
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists