[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101116181906.GA21926@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:19:06 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/20] ARM: LPAE: Introduce L_PTE_NOEXEC and
L_PTE_NOWRITE
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 03:18:03PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 15 November 2010 18:30, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > Let's not make this more complicated than it has to be. If we need the
> > inverse of WRITE and EXEC, then that's what we should change everyone to,
> > not invent a new system to work along side the old system.
>
> This adds an additional instruction in set_pte_ext, unless you can
> write the bit checking in a better way:
It actually results in the same number of instructions. From memory:
ARMv3-ARMv5:
- eor r3, r1, #L_PTE_PRESENT | L_PTE_YOUNG | L_PTE_WRITE | L_PTE_DIRTY
- tst r3, #L_PTE_WRITE | L_PTE_DIRTY @ write and dirty?
- orreq r2, r2, #PTE_SMALL_AP_UNO_SRW
+ eor r3, r1, #L_PTE_PRESENT | L_PTE_YOUNG | L_PTE_DIRTY
+ tst r3, #L_PTE_RDONLY | L_PTE_DIRTY @ write and dirty?
+ orreq r2, r2, #PTE_SMALL_AP_UNO_SRW
and for ARMv6+:
- tst r1, #L_PTE_WRITE
- tstne r1, #L_PTE_DIRTY
- orreq r3, r3, #PTE_EXT_APX
+ eor r1, r1, #L_PTE_DIRTY
+ tst r1, #L_PTE_RDONLY | L_PTE_DIRTY
+ orrne r3, r3, #PTE_EXT_APX
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists