[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26645.1289929851@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:50:51 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.3 4/4] keys: add new key-type encrypted
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I actually like keyctl requiring 'trusted:' or 'user:'. Forcing the
> user to indicate which type of key they want, is actually good - no
> misunderstandings.
You still need to prefix the description of a user-defined key so that you
don't collide with other people who're also using user-defined keys for random things.
> Another benefit, would be allowing 'keyctl update' to update the key
> description, not the key type.
You mean you want to change the description on a key?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists