linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make swap accounting default behavior configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101116124615.978ed940.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:46:15 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make swap accounting default behavior configurable

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:17:26 +0100
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> could you consider the following patch for the Linus tree, please?
> The discussion took place in this email thread 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/10/114.
> The patch is based on top of 151f52f09c572 commit in the Linus tree.
> 
> Please let me know if there I should route this patch through somebody
> else.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> ---
> >From 30238aaec758988493af793939f14b0ba83dc4b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:30:04 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Make swap accounting default behavior configurable
> 
> Swap accounting can be configured by CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
> configuration option and then it is turned on by default. There is
> a boot option (noswapaccount) which can disable this feature.
> 
> This makes it hard for distributors to enable the configuration option
> as this feature leads to a bigger memory consumption and this is a no-go
> for general purpose distribution kernel. On the other hand swap
> accounting may be very usuful for some workloads.

This patch is needed by distros, and distros use the -stable tree, I
assume.  Do you see reasons why this patch should be backported into
-stable, so distros don't need to patch it themselves?  If so, any
particular kernel versions?  2.6.37?

> This patch adds a new configuration option which controls the default
> behavior (CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP_ENABLED). If the option is selected
> then the feature is turned on by default.
> 
> It also adds a new boot parameter swapaccount which (contrary to
> noswapaccount) enables the feature. (I would consider swapaccount=yes|no
> semantic with removed noswapaccount parameter much better but this
> parameter is kind of API which might be in use and unexpected breakage
> is no-go.)
> 
> The default behavior is unchanged (if CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP is
> enabled then CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP_ENABLED is enabled as well)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Acked-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
> ---
>  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    3 +++
>  init/Kconfig                        |   13 +++++++++++++
>  mm/memcontrol.c                     |   15 ++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index ed45e98..14eafa5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -2385,6 +2385,9 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
>  			improve throughput, but will also increase the
>  			amount of memory reserved for use by the client.
>  
> +	swapaccount	[KNL] Enable accounting of swap in memory resource
> +			controller. (See Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt)

So we have swapaccount and noswapaccount.  Ho hum, "swapaccount=[1|0]"
would have been better.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/