linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] SCSI host lock push-down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1289943158.11405.261.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date:	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:32:38 -0600
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] SCSI host lock push-down

On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 13:30 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:36 AM, James Bottomley
> <James.Bottomley@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > I was thinking through next for a few days to see if anything breaks in
> > the architectures with scsi drivers we can't compile on x86 ... but
> > realistically that will happen in -rcX as well, so I'm happy either way.
> 
> I really just wanted a firm "just take the patch" or "wait for a
> pull", so that I can forget about this issue either way.
> 
> But it sounds like I have an ack for you, so I might as well just take
> the patch.

You do ... if you need it formally:

Acked-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/