[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101116125726.db42723c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:57:26 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] memcg: make throttle_vm_writeout() memcg aware
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:39:35 -0800
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Odd branch ordering, but I may be OCDing again.
> >
> > if (mem_cgroup && memcg_dirty_info())
> > do_mem_cgroup_stuff()
> > else
> > do_global_stuff()
> >
> > would be more natural, IMO.
>
> I agree. I will resubmit this series with your improved branch ordering.
>
Hmm. I think this patch is troublesome.
This patch will make memcg's pageout routine _not_ throttoled even when the whole
system vmscan's pageout is throttoled.
So, one idea is....
Make this change
==
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone, sc, priority, 0);
- throttle_vm_writeout(sc->gfp_mask);
+ throttle_vm_writeout(sc->gfp_mask, sc->mem_cgroup);
}
==
as
==
if (!sc->mem_cgroup || throttle_vm_writeout(sc->gfp_mask, sc->mem_cgroup) == not throttled)
throttole_vm_writeout(sc->gfp_mask, NULL);
Then, both of memcg and global dirty thresh will be checked.
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists