[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CE30108.7010207@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:09:12 -0800
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New utility: 'trace'
On 11/16/2010 02:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 22:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>
>> Would you be interested in helping out with (and testing) such a more generic
>> approach?
>
> how about having perf-record open a named pipe and rewriting everything
> that comes in through that as an event and storing it in the buffer?
When I'm tracing an app or test-case, I want to be able to quickly add
and change strings. I like the trace_printk sort of access as it avoids
having to do a bunch of string formatting (sprintf()) calls in the test app.
--
Darren Hart
Yocto Linux Kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists