lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:28:50 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mika Westerberg <ext-mika.1.westerberg@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] proc/vmcore: allow archs to override
 vmcore_elf_check_arch()

On Tue,  9 Nov 2010 11:06:10 +0200
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi> wrote:

> From: Mika Westerberg <ext-mika.1.westerberg@...ia.com>
> 
> Allow architectures to redefine this macro if needed. This is useful for
> example in architectures where 64-bit ELF vmcores are not supported.
> Specifying zero vmcore_elf64_check_arch() allows compiler to optimize
> away unnecessary parts of parse_crash_elf64_headers().
> 
> We also rename the macro to vmcore_elf64_check_arch() to reflect that it
> is used for 64-bit vmcores only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <ext-mika.1.westerberg@...ia.com>
> ---
>  fs/proc/vmcore.c           |    2 +-
>  include/linux/crash_dump.h |    9 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> index 2367fb3..74802bc5 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static int __init parse_crash_elf64_headers(void)
>  	/* Do some basic Verification. */
>  	if (memcmp(ehdr.e_ident, ELFMAG, SELFMAG) != 0 ||
>  		(ehdr.e_type != ET_CORE) ||
> -		!vmcore_elf_check_arch(&ehdr) ||
> +		!vmcore_elf64_check_arch(&ehdr) ||
>  		ehdr.e_ident[EI_CLASS] != ELFCLASS64 ||
>  		ehdr.e_ident[EI_VERSION] != EV_CURRENT ||
>  		ehdr.e_version != EV_CURRENT ||
> diff --git a/include/linux/crash_dump.h b/include/linux/crash_dump.h
> index 0026f26..088cd4a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/crash_dump.h
> +++ b/include/linux/crash_dump.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,14 @@ extern ssize_t copy_oldmem_page(unsigned long, char *, size_t,
>  #define vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross(x) 0
>  #endif
>  
> -#define vmcore_elf_check_arch(x) (elf_check_arch(x) || vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross(x))
> +/*
> + * Architecture code can redefine this if there are any special checks
> + * needed for 64-bit ELF vmcores. In case of 32-bit only architecture,
> + * this can be set to zero.
> + */
> +#ifndef vmcore_elf64_check_arch
> +#define vmcore_elf64_check_arch(x) (elf_check_arch(x) || vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross(x))
> +#endif
>  

Looks OK to me.  I'd suggest that this patch be merged along with the
others, via whatever tree they're taken into.  Russell's ARM tree, I
assume.

Should elf_check_arch() be renamed to elf64_check_arch()?

Ditto vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ