[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B85A65D85D7EB246BE421B3FB0FBB5930234A2AF08@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:19:49 +0530
From: "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>
To: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@...ai.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>
CC: "davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mach-davinci: signedness bug
Hi Nicolas,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 00:10:28, Nicolas Kaiser wrote:
> aemif_calc_rate() can return a negative error value, so all the
> variables that get tested for this value need to be signed.
>
> The maximum bit width of WSETUP(WSETUP_MAX) appears to be 30 bits
> (0xf << 26). Using a signed instead of an unsigned integer
> shouldn't make a difference here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@...ai.net>
Thanks for the fix. You could use the subject:
"davinci: signedness bug in davinci_aemif_setup_timing()"
Other than that:
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Thanks,
Sekhar
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/aemif.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/aemif.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/aemif.c
> index 9c3f500..1ce70a9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/aemif.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/aemif.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ int davinci_aemif_setup_timing(struct davinci_aemif_timing *t,
> void __iomem *base, unsigned cs)
> {
> unsigned set, val;
> - unsigned ta, rhold, rstrobe, rsetup, whold, wstrobe, wsetup;
> + int ta, rhold, rstrobe, rsetup, whold, wstrobe, wsetup;
> unsigned offset = A1CR_OFFSET + cs * 4;
> struct clk *aemif_clk;
> unsigned long clkrate;
> --
> 1.7.2.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists