[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101116053214.GB15652@jasper.tkos.co.il>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:32:14 +0200
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
To: Gregory Bean <gbean@...eaurora.org>
Cc: dwalker@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] msm: gpio: Add v2 gpio support to MSM SoCs.
Hi Gregory,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:20:18PM -0800, Gregory Bean wrote:
> Beginning with the MSM8x60, the hardware block responsible for gpio
> support changes. Provide gpiolib support for the new v2 architecture.
>
> Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Bean <gbean@...eaurora.org>
> ---
[snip]
> +struct msm_gpio_dev {
> + struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
> +};
This wrapper struct seems redundant. You only use it in msm_gpio_probe, where
you can just use 'struct gpio_chip' directly.
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tlmm_lock);
> +
> +static inline struct msm_gpio_dev *to_msm_gpio_dev(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> +{
> + return container_of(chip, struct msm_gpio_dev, gpio_chip);
> +}
Not used.
> +static inline void set_gpio_bits(unsigned n, void __iomem *reg)
> +{
> + writel(readl(reg) | n, reg);
> +}
Move the locking in, or better, eliminate it, since it's only used in
msm_gpio_direction_output.
[snip]
> +static struct platform_device msm_device_gpio = {
> + .name = "msmgpio",
> + .id = 0,
Redundant.
> +};
baruch
--
~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@...s.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists