[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289969017.2732.82.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:43:37 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cypher Wu <cypher.w@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel rwlock design, Multicore and IGMP
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 09:30 +0800, Cypher Wu a écrit :
> O
> struct in_device::mr_ifc_timer. Every time when a process join/leave a
> MC group, igmp_ifc_event() -> igmp_ifc_start_timer() will start the
> timer on the core that the system call issued, and
> igmp_ifc_timer_expire() will be called on that core in the bottem halt
> of timer interrupt.
> If we call join/leave on mutlicores that timers will run on all these
> cores, but it seems only one or two will generate IGMP message, others
> will only lock the list and loop throught it with nothing generated.
>
>
Problem would not be timer being restarted on different cores (very
small impact), but scanning a list in igmpv3_send_cr() with many items
in it and expensive things, under timer handler (softirq), so adding
spikes of latency.
IGMP_Unsolicited_Report_Interval is 10 seconds, so we start timer in a 5
second average.
I am not sure there is a need to join/leave thousand of groups per
second anyway...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists