linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3] drivers/misc: Altera active serial implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CE36B8B.3040403@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:43:39 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
CC:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Alex Gershgorin <agersh@...bler.ru>,
	Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] drivers/misc: Altera active serial implementation

On 11/16/2010 09:32 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Jiri, Alan,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:09:45PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 11/16/2010 12:04 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> Sixteen devices is way too many for drivers/misc - it only has 256 total
>>> and only half of those are dynamic.
>>
>> Seconded. (And it's a quarter, not even a half like I already wrote.)
> 
> If I reduce the maximal number of devices to 4, will it make any difference? I 
> don't mind even having a limit of 2 by default, as long as a simple define 
> change is enough to raise this limit.
> 
Just use a major.  No biggie.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/