[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4CE397BF0200007800022AD6@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:52:15 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] x86-64: fix and clean up AMD Fam10 MMCONF
enabling
>>> On 16.11.10 at 23:26, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 12:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -206,8 +200,10 @@ void __cpuinit fam10h_check_enable_mmcfg
>> * with 256 buses
>> */
>> get_fam10h_pci_mmconf_base();
>> - if (fam10h_pci_mmconf_base_status <= 0)
>> + if (!fam10h_pci_mmconf_base) {
>> + pci_probe &= ~PCI_CHECK_ENABLE_AMD_MMCONF;
>
> case: if no cpu mmconf reg are set by BIOS and later if BSP can not get new
> base,
>
> this pci_probe &= line will be called for every AP...
No, because the function itself has
if (!(pci_probe & PCI_CHECK_ENABLE_AMD_MMCONF))
return;
at its very beginning.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists