[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=X2noJJwJwWh30-ac76f-pN5W0cD2c9w0F1EeK@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:47:09 +0800
From: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 1/2] lib, Make gen_pool memory allocator lockless
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 10:18 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>>
>> cmpxchg has been used in that way by ftrace and perf for a long time. So
>> I agree to make it a requirement on future architecture ports.
>
> Neither mandate an architecture do this though, only that when an
> architecture wants to support either feature and has NMIs (not all archs
> have NMI equivalents) it has to be safe.
So we can make sure cmpxchg can be used in lock-less code on
architectures with perf, irq_work or ftrace enabled?
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists