[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289996503.2109.728.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:21:43 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] x86/ticketlock: add slowpath logic
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 13:08 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Maintain a flag in both LSBs of the ticket lock which indicates whether
> anyone is in the lock slowpath and may need kicking when the current
> holder unlocks. The flags are set when the first locker enters
> the slowpath, and cleared when unlocking to an empty queue.
So here you say you set both LSBs in order to keep head == tail working,
but the code seems to suggest you only use the tail LSB.
I think I see why using only one LSB is sufficient, but some consistency
would be nice :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists