[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101117150516.18136834@deb0>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:05:16 +0200
From: Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New utility: 'trace'
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:51:52 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 14:47 +0200, Török Edwin wrote:
> > I see --call-graph in the trace record -h output, but it doesn't
> > seem to work on x86_64 for me.
>
> If you want to unwind userspace you need to build everything with
> framepointers -- sadly some people have been lobbying to remove
> framepointers from all distro builds, even though on x86_64 its nearly
> free (i386 does have a significant performance benefit, sadly).
>
> There's some work on-going to simply copy out the top of stack and let
> dwarves go wild at it in userspace, but that isn't done yet.
Even without frame-pointers I should see at least the first caller in
userspace, since that can be obtained by reading the return address of
the syscall, right?
I don't see any difference in the output of 'trace report' thats why
I'm asking it is implemented at all right now, or I need additional
flags to see it.
I do see some difference in output of 'perf record -g/perf report'
though.
Best regards,
--Edwin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists