[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19684.3589.497919.669784@quad.stoffel.home>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:16:53 -0500
From: "John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org>
To: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups
>>>>> "Lennart" == Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de> writes:
Lennart> I wouldn't be too concerned here. It's not that we end up
Lennart> with 1000s of groups here. It's way < 40 or in the end, for a
Lennart> single user machine. Which I think isn't that bad.
Ok, so how will this impact users on a single machine which is used to
host VNC sessions? I've got machines with 30+ users all running one
or more VNC sessions each on there. Nothing CPU bound generally,
unless something freaks out and starts hogging a CPU. But will the
overhead of 1000 groups be noticeable?
Thanks,
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists