[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290024072.2109.1247.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:01:12 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
"robert.richter" <robert.richter@....com>,
fweisbec <fweisbec@...il.com>, paulus <paulus@...ba.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf: sysfs type id
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 20:57 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > How about a compromise position: all of the arch-specific events are
> > exposed to user space via sysfs iff some CONFIG_* variable to set to
> > true. Something like CONFIG_EXPOSE_ALL_HW_PERF_EVENTS_IN_SYSFS.
> > This way you would only use all that memory when it's explicitly
> > configured in.
Another thing you could do is make all PMU drivers loadable modules
(most of the infrastructure for that is present) and make the exhaustive
list either a module parameter or another module extending the PMU
driver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists