[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101117140526.d532b373.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:05:26 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: BKL: remove extraneous #include <smp_lock.h>
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:59:01 GMT Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/linus/451a3c24b0135bce54542009b5fde43846c7cf67
> Commit: 451a3c24b0135bce54542009b5fde43846c7cf67
> Parent: 55f6561c6941713ab5ae9180525b026dd40b7d14
> Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> AuthorDate: Wed Nov 17 16:26:55 2010 +0100
> Committer: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> CommitDate: Wed Nov 17 08:59:32 2010 -0800
>
> BKL: remove extraneous #include <smp_lock.h>
>
> The big kernel lock has been removed from all these files at some point,
> leaving only the #include.
>
> Remove this too as a cleanup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
causes build errors in linux-next of NOV. 17.
see http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/17/339
and http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/17/365
smp_lock.h was removed from hardirq.h. smp_lock.h provided the function prototype
for kernel_locked(). Should source files now #include <linux/smp_lock.h> ?
even when not being built for SMP?
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists