linux-kernel - Re: Galbraith patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1290036969.26521.15.camel@note-311a>
Date:	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:36:09 -0200
From:	Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nunes@...betti.com.br>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Galbraith patch

Hi...

On fact, when I try apply the patch, I took some errors. Here's:

patching file include/linux/sched.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 506 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 575 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1905 (offset -31 lines).
patching file kernel/sched.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 613 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 2010.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 7753 (offset -230 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 8283 (offset -230 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 8308 (offset -230 lines).
1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/sched.c.rej
patching file kernel/fork.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 173 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 902 (offset -4 lines).
patching file drivers/tty/tty_io.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 3160.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
drivers/tty/tty_io.c.rej
patching file kernel/sched_autogroup.h
patching file kernel/sched_autogroup.c
patching file kernel/sysctl.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 384 (offset 2 lines).
patching file init/Kconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 652 with fuzz 2 (offset -76 lines).
patching file Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1610 (offset -12 lines).

Attached, you have the patch.

How can I fix this! 

Note: I'm using Ubuntu Linux 10.10... But, as I said before, I'm using
vanilla kernel... 

Thanks again

Em Qua, 2010-11-17 às 16:21 -0700, Mike Galbraith escreveu:
> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 17:18 -0200, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
> > Here is!!
> 
> Hm.  Looks like you must have a miss-applied patch.  Builds fine here
> with your config.
> 
> 	-Mike
> 

-- 
--
Gilberto Nunes

<><

View attachment "patch" of type "text/x-patch" (10992 bytes)