[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290082932.30543.101.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 07:22:11 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"jason.wessel" <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Make event based
trace_printk()
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 13:50 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 11:58 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > +#define trace_printk(fmt, args...) \
> > + do { \
> > + static struct event_printk_struct \
> > + __attribute__((__aligned__(4))) \
> > + __attribute__((section("_trace_printk"))) \
> > + ______t = { \
> > + .format = fmt, \
>
> if fmt is not constant, the compiler will complain...
Ah you are right. I added that after I wrote all this code and wanted
the format to print in the file. The original code required the compile
check below.
-- Steve
>
> > + .func = __func__, \
> > + .file = __FILE__, \
> > + .line = __LINE__, \
> > + }; \
> > + __trace_printk_check_format(fmt, ##args); \
> > + if (!__builtin_constant_p(fmt)) \
> > + trace_printk_can_only_have_constant_format(); \
>
> so this is not need.
>
> > + if (unlikely(__event_printk_test(&______t.enable))) \
> > + __trace_bprintk(_THIS_IP_, fmt, ##args); \
> > + } while (0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists