lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:17:12 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>, ying.huang@...el.com, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 0/6] x86, NMI: give NMI handler a face-lift On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 06:47 -0600, Jason Wessel wrote: > More specifically > when another subsystem injects an NMI event the perf NMI code returns > NOTIFY_STOP. Not unconditionally, right? We only do so when the previous NMI was from the PMU and nobody claimed this one (NOTIFY_STOP from DIE_NMIUNKNOWN). Or are you hitting the other one, where !handled but pmu_nmi.handled > 1 ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists