| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-64edc8ed5ffae999d8d413ba006850e9e34166cb@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:08:01 GMT
From: tip-bot for matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sliakh.lkml@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, ak@....de,
jiang@...ncsu.edu, kees.cook@...onical.com,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com,
arjan@...radead.org, castet.matthieu@...e.fr, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:x86/security] x86: Fix improper large page preservation
Commit-ID: 64edc8ed5ffae999d8d413ba006850e9e34166cb
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/64edc8ed5ffae999d8d413ba006850e9e34166cb
Author: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>
AuthorDate: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:30:27 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:52:04 +0100
x86: Fix improper large page preservation
This patch fixes a bug in try_preserve_large_page() which may
result in improper large page preservation and improper
application of page attributes to the memory area outside of the
original change request.
More specifically, the problem manifests itself when set_memory_*()
is called for several pages at the beginning of the large page and
try_preserve_large_page() erroneously concludes that the change can
be applied to whole large page.
The fix consists of 3 parts:
1. Addition of "required" protection attributes in
static_protections(), so .data and .bss can be guaranteed to
stay "RW"
2. static_protections() is now called for every small
page within large page to determine compatibility of new
protection attributes (instead of just small pages within the
requested range).
3. Large page can be preserved only if attribute change is
large-page-aligned and covers whole large page.
-v1: Try_preserve_large_page() patch for Linux 2.6.34-rc2
-v2: Replaced pfn check with address check for kernel rw-data
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Xuxian Jiang <jiang@...ncsu.edu>
Reviewed-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <4CE2F7F3.8030809@...e.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
index 532e793..6f2a6b6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ static inline pgprot_t static_protections(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long address,
unsigned long pfn)
{
pgprot_t forbidden = __pgprot(0);
+ pgprot_t required = __pgprot(0);
/*
* The BIOS area between 640k and 1Mb needs to be executable for
@@ -278,6 +279,12 @@ static inline pgprot_t static_protections(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long address,
if (within(pfn, __pa((unsigned long)__start_rodata) >> PAGE_SHIFT,
__pa((unsigned long)__end_rodata) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
pgprot_val(forbidden) |= _PAGE_RW;
+ /*
+ * .data and .bss should always be writable.
+ */
+ if (within(address, (unsigned long)_sdata, (unsigned long)_edata) ||
+ within(address, (unsigned long)__bss_start, (unsigned long)__bss_stop))
+ pgprot_val(required) |= _PAGE_RW;
#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA)
/*
@@ -317,6 +324,7 @@ static inline pgprot_t static_protections(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long address,
#endif
prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~pgprot_val(forbidden));
+ prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | pgprot_val(required));
return prot;
}
@@ -393,7 +401,7 @@ try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address,
{
unsigned long nextpage_addr, numpages, pmask, psize, flags, addr, pfn;
pte_t new_pte, old_pte, *tmp;
- pgprot_t old_prot, new_prot;
+ pgprot_t old_prot, new_prot, req_prot;
int i, do_split = 1;
unsigned int level;
@@ -438,10 +446,10 @@ try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address,
* We are safe now. Check whether the new pgprot is the same:
*/
old_pte = *kpte;
- old_prot = new_prot = pte_pgprot(old_pte);
+ old_prot = new_prot = req_prot = pte_pgprot(old_pte);
- pgprot_val(new_prot) &= ~pgprot_val(cpa->mask_clr);
- pgprot_val(new_prot) |= pgprot_val(cpa->mask_set);
+ pgprot_val(req_prot) &= ~pgprot_val(cpa->mask_clr);
+ pgprot_val(req_prot) |= pgprot_val(cpa->mask_set);
/*
* old_pte points to the large page base address. So we need
@@ -450,17 +458,17 @@ try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address,
pfn = pte_pfn(old_pte) + ((address & (psize - 1)) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
cpa->pfn = pfn;
- new_prot = static_protections(new_prot, address, pfn);
+ new_prot = static_protections(req_prot, address, pfn);
/*
* We need to check the full range, whether
* static_protection() requires a different pgprot for one of
* the pages in the range we try to preserve:
*/
- addr = address + PAGE_SIZE;
- pfn++;
- for (i = 1; i < cpa->numpages; i++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, pfn++) {
- pgprot_t chk_prot = static_protections(new_prot, addr, pfn);
+ addr = address & pmask;
+ pfn = pte_pfn(old_pte);
+ for (i = 0; i < (psize >> PAGE_SHIFT); i++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, pfn++) {
+ pgprot_t chk_prot = static_protections(req_prot, addr, pfn);
if (pgprot_val(chk_prot) != pgprot_val(new_prot))
goto out_unlock;
@@ -483,7 +491,7 @@ try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address,
* that we limited the number of possible pages already to
* the number of pages in the large page.
*/
- if (address == (nextpage_addr - psize) && cpa->numpages == numpages) {
+ if (address == (address & pmask) && cpa->numpages == (psize >> PAGE_SHIFT)) {
/*
* The address is aligned and the number of pages
* covers the full page.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists