linux-kernel - Re: [build failure] Re: BKL: remove extraneous #include <smp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CE55445.8040002@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:28:53 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [build failure] Re: BKL: remove extraneous #include <smp_lock.h>

On 11/18/10 08:02, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> How painful would it be to move lock_depth into thread_struct? I guess
>> we don't have anything that cares about structure offsets in assembly
>> for that thing.  I should just try.
> 
> Gaah, the only generic field there is the restart_block, so we'd have
> to hide it there, or then add it to each architecture. So scratch
> that.
> 
> I guess this is the simplest approach.

Yes, that builds.  Thanks.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/