[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101118163439.GA21318@localhost>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:34:39 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, "Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: prevent bandwidth calculation overflow
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:29:00AM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 00:06 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:02:01AM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 23:44 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > + pause = HZ * pages_dirtied / (bw + 1);
> > >
> > > Shouldn't that be using something like div64_u64 ?
> >
> > OK, but a dumb question: gcc cannot handle this implicitly?
>
> it could, but we chose not to implement the symbol it emits for these
> things so as to cause pain.. that was still assuming the world of 32bit
> computing was relevant and 64bit divides were expensive ;-)
Good to know that, thanks! So let's avoid it totally :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists