[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1011182158270.11697@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:59:07 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Youngdale <eric@...ante.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][resend][SCSI] Reduce number of sequential pointer derefs
in scsi_error.c and reduce size as well
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:49:29PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > @@ -617,10 +623,10 @@ static int scsi_try_bus_device_reset(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> >
> > static int __scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> > {
> > - if (!scmd->device->host->hostt->eh_abort_handler)
> > - return FAILED;
> > -
> > - return scmd->device->host->hostt->eh_abort_handler(scmd);
> > + struct scsi_host_template *hostt = scmd->device->host->hostt;
> > + if (!hostt->eh_abort_handler)
> > + return FAILED;
> > + return hostt->eh_abort_handler(scmd);
>
> Not that I have much to do with SCSI anymore... I spotted the above.
> Is there any particular reason for using spaces to indent here rather
> than our usual tabs?
>
No. That was me and Emacs having a slight disagreement (see the mail I
just sent)...
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists