[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011181326010.26680@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:28:45 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, shaohui.zheng@...ux.intel.com,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...el.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [7/8,v3] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: extend memory probe interface
to support NUMA
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Paul Mundt wrote:
> This is all stuff that the memblock API can deal with, I'm not sure why
> there seems to be an insistence on wedging all manner of unrelated bits
> in to e820. Many platforms using memblock today already offline large
> amounts of contiguous physical memory for use in drivers, if you were to
> follow this scheme and simply layer a node creation shim on top of that
> you would end up with something that is almost entirely generic.
>
I don't see why this patchset needs to use the memblock API at all, it
should be built entirely on the generic mem-hotplug API. The only
extension needed is the remapping of removed memory to a new node id (done
on x86 with update_nodes_add()) prior to add_memory() for each arch that
supports onlining new nodes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists