linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slub: operate cache name memory same to slab and slob

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:27:45 -0600
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	b32542@...escale.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
	penberg@...helsinki.fi, tytso@....edu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Zeng Zhaoming <zengzm.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: operate cache name memory same to slab and slob

On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 13:36 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Matt Mackall wrote:
> 
> > > Get a memory leak complaint about ext4:
> > >   comm "mount", pid 1159, jiffies 4294904647 (age 6077.804s)
> > >   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> > >     65 78 74 34 5f 67 72 6f 75 70 69 6e 66 6f 5f 31  ext4_groupinfo_1
> > >     30 00 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b a5  0.kkkkkkkkkkkkk.
> > >   backtrace:
> > >     [<c068ade3>] kmemleak_alloc+0x93/0xd0
> > >     [<c024e54c>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x30c/0x380
> > >     [<c02269d3>] kstrdup+0x33/0x60
> > >     [<c0318a70>] ext4_mb_init+0x4e0/0x550
> > >     [<c0304e0e>] ext4_fill_super+0x1e6e/0x2f60
> > >     [<c0261140>] mount_bdev+0x1c0/0x1f0
> > >     [<c02fc00f>] ext4_mount+0x1f/0x30
> > >     [<c02603d8>] vfs_kern_mount+0x78/0x250
> > >     [<c026060e>] do_kern_mount+0x3e/0x100
> > >     [<c027b4c2>] do_mount+0x2e2/0x780
> > >     [<c027ba04>] sys_mount+0xa4/0xd0
> > >     [<c010429f>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
> > >     [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> > > 
> > > It is cause by slub manage the cache name different from slab and slob.
> > > In slab and slob, only reference to name, alloc and reclaim the memory
> > > is the duty of the code that invoked kmem_cache_create().
> > > 
> > > In slub, cache name duplicated when create. This ambiguity will cause
> > > some memory leaks and double free if kmem_cache_create() pass a
> > > dynamic malloc cache name.
> > 
> > I don't get it.
> > 
> > Caller allocates X, passes X to slub, slub duplicates X as X', and
> > properly frees X', then caller frees X. Yes, that's silly, but where's
> > the leak?
> > 
> 
> The leak in ext4_mb_init() above is because it is using kstrdup() to 
> allocate the string itself and then on destroy uses kmem_cache_name() to 
> attain the slub allocator's pointer to the name, not the memory the ext4 
> layer allocated itself.

And Pekka says:

> The kstrdup() is there because of SLUB cache merging. See commit 
> 84c1cf62465e2fb0a692620dcfeb52323ab03d48 ("SLUB: Fix merged slab 
> cache names") for details.

I see. So we can either:

- force anyone using dynamically-allocated names to track their own damn
pointer
- implement kstrdup in the other allocators and fix all callers (the
bulk of which use static names!)
- eliminate dynamically-allocated names (mostly useless when we start
merging slabs!)
- add an indirection layer for slub that holds the unmerged details
- stop pretending we track slab names and show only generic names based
on size in /proc

kmem_cache_name() is also a highly suspect function in a
post-merged-slabs kernel. As ext4 is the only user in the kernel, and it
got it wrong, perhaps it's time to rip it out.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/