[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikB6QXxTav=b7qNzHUv4HXnjjT9TdcEdTYHbEkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 04:31:50 -0800
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@...la.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, david@...g.hm,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> It must be nice to be that ignorant ;-) Speaking for the scheduler
> cgroup controller (that being the only one I actually know), most all
> the load-balance operations are O(n) in the number of active cgroups,
> and a lot of the cpu local schedule operations are O(d) where d is the
> depth of the cgroup tree.
The same would apply to CPU autogroups, presumably?
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists