[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C47257FC-498A-41B0-BC94-C81C72601D53@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:07:12 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andev <debiandev@...il.com>,
Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups
On Nov 19, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:
>> t means it will become
>> impossible to sanely switch off (gnome firmly believes knobs are evil),
>> leaving everybody who _does_ know wth they're doing up a certain creek
>> without a paddle.
>
> Please, can we stop with this false dichotomy? This is decidedly not
> true and as Lennart has already pointed out, the knob already exists in
> systemd. You may like the kernel approach, but this does not mean there
> is no place for grouping driven by userspace.
Yes, and then at the next release, some idiotic GNOME engineer will decide to the "improve" the system by removing yet another knob....
-- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists