linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Generic hardware error reporting support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTim0mq8Pyyi+9cAmHBct5OXH+PG7G1mQ5aneEwZV@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:28:36 +0800
From:	huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Generic hardware error reporting support

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 21:06 +0800, huang ying wrote:
>>
>> I lists the requirements and my solutions in my patch description of
>> [1/2] and [2/2]. If you have any question, please let me know.
>
> Those talk about _your_ requirements, it does not touch upon any of the
> concerns of the other parties, it doesn't even mention them beyond
> listing their existence.

They are welcome to talk about their requirement and opinion in the thread.

> It also, very specifically, does not mention if you did talk to any of
> those parties and what their thought on the matter was, nor does it ask
> them about their opinion.

Again opinion is welcome. I just want to talk with code.

> Instead you present your work as a fait accompli, not a work in flux and
> subject to change. You ask for it to be merged -- this does not come
> across like a discussion, much less a request for co-operation.

I heard about that LKML likes talk with code instead of idea. Am I wrong?

Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/