[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CE695FF.20601@teksavvy.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:21:35 -0500
From: Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...e.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, tytso <tytso@....edu>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super_operation
On 10-11-19 09:57 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:53:52AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> On 10-11-19 09:40 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
>>>
>>> We've been told that online and constant trimming is the default in
>>> windows7. The ssds are most likely to just start ignoring the trims
>>> they can't service efficiently.
>>
>> Win7 collects multiple TRIM ranges over time and batches them as single TRIMs
>> (as reported to me by an SSD vendor who traced it with a SATA analyzer,
>> and who also apparently has "inside info").
>
> I really hate to rely on this third party hearsay (from all sides), and
> have implement TRIM support in qemu now. I'll soon install win7 and
> will check out the TRIM patters myself.
Excellent!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists