[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101119154540.GG10039@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:45:40 -0500
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Use memory compaction instead of lumpy reclaim
during high-order allocations
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 02:05:32PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >
> > How about making the default before 2.6.40, as an initial step?
> >
>
> It'd be a reasonable way of ensuring it's being tested everywhere
> and not by those that are interested or using distro kernel configs.
> I guess we'd set to "default y" in the same patch that adds the note to
> feature-removal-schedule.txt.
I'd suggest doing it now (or soon, before 2.6.40), just to make sure
there aren't massive complaints about performance regressions, etc.,
and then deprecating it at say 2.6.42, and then waiting 6-9 months
before removing it. But, I'm a bit more conservative about making
such changes.
(Said the person who has reluctantly agreed to keep the minixdf mount
option after we found users when we tried deprecating it. :-)
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists