linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:08:28 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the  tree

On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi Jiri,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the trivial tree got a conflict in
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf538/include/mach/defBF539.h,
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf518/include/mach/defBF51x_base.h and
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf527/include/mach/defBF52x_base.h between various
> commits from the blackfin tree and commit
> b595076a180a56d1bb170e6eceda6eb9d76f4cd3 ("tree-wide: fix comment/printk
> typos") from the trivial tree.
> 
> I just used the versions from the blackfin tree for now since they moved
> large amounts of code around and deleted the latter 2 files.

I have reverted those hunks in my tree, so it should be conflict-less now.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/