[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101119161929.GI10039@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:19:29 -0500
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Add EXT4_IOC_TRIM ioctl to handle batched
discard
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:36:49AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> @@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ struct ext4_new_group_data {
> /* note ioctl 11 reserved for filesystem-independent FIEMAP ioctl */
> #define EXT4_IOC_ALLOC_DA_BLKS _IO('f', 12)
> #define EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT _IOWR('f', 15, struct move_extent)
> +#define EXT4_IOC_TRIM FITRIM
If we're going to keep FITRIM defined in include/fs.h, then we should
just dispatch off of FITRIM below, and not define EXT4_IOC_TRIM.
> + case EXT4_IOC_TRIM:
> + {
Agreed?
There's no point making this look like an EXT4-specific interface; if
other file systems want to implement FITRIM as an ioctl, they are free
to do so.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists