linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101119.084302.71115175.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:43:02 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mzxreary@...inter.de
Cc:	tytso@....EDU, bgamari.foss@...il.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	debiandev@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, dhaval.giani@...il.com, efault@....de,
	vgoyal@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, markus@...ppelsdorf.de,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups

From: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:34:31 +0100

> On Fri, 19.11.10 08:29, David Miller (davem@...emloft.net) wrote:
> 
>> Someone who argues and behaves in that way is not someone I put much
>> stock in as far as implementing things in a wise or well informed way,
>> it feels more like a mechanism which is being forced and rushed ahead
>> without enough research or consideration.
> 
> Wow, so much hate!

Thanks for not addressing my technical arguments at all, which
serves only to further my reservations.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/