[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTiniSAbRUkDROyaa9jD28iBd423e3=hqP4+R4uB4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:15:32 -0500
From: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@...ometrics.ca>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"Govindarajan, Sriramakrishnan" <srk@...com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Clouter <alex@...riz.org.uk>,
Chris Cordahi <christophercordahi@...ometrics.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] da850-evm: add baseboard UI expander buttons,
switches and LEDs
Hi Dmitry,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> Another question is why do you want to poll the same device at
> different intervals? The processor is already woken up so it makes sense
> to do as much as possible instead of going to sleep. In your case
> 200/700 for every 1400ms interval you wake an extra time to poll
> switches so unless polling switches takes very long time it is better to
> combine them together (and into one input device, probably).
I see. That is a good question :)
I didn't realize that splitting into two separate input devices with
different polling intervals would have the opposite effect than what I
intended. Thank you for pointing this out. I will definitely integrate
them into one input device polled at 200ms.
Best Regards,
Ben Gardiner
---
Nanometrics Inc.
http://www.nanometrics.ca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists