linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/4] taskstats: Improve cumulative time accounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1290197955.2109.1617.camel@laptop>
Date:	Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:19:15 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Shailabh Nagar <nagar1234@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	John stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] taskstats: Improve cumulative time accounting

On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 21:11 +0100, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> Due to POSIX POSIX.1-2001, the CPU time of processes is not accounted
> to the cumulative time of the parents, if the parents ignore SIGCHLD
> or have set SA_NOCLDWAIT. This behaviour has the major drawback that
> it is not possible to calculate all consumed CPU time of a system by
> looking at the current tasks. CPU time can be lost.
> 
> To solve this problem, this patch set duplicates the cumulative accounting
> data in the signal_struct. In the second set (cdata_acct) the complete
> cumulative resource counters are stored. The new cumulative CPU time (utime
> and stime) is then exported via the taskstats interface. 

Maybe this has been treated earlier in the threads and I missed it, but
the obvious solution doesn't get mentioned:

What would break if we violate this silly POSIX rule and account time of
childs regardless of SIGCHLD/SA_NOCLDWAIT?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/