[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290201154.2116.29.camel@morgan.silverblock.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:12:34 -0500
From: Andy Walls <andy@...verblocksystems.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: make /proc/kallsyms mode 400 to reduce ease of
attacking
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Sarah Sharp
> <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > .config and dmesg are attached. The box is running klogd 1.5.5ubuntu3
> > (from Jaunty). Yes, I know that's old. I read the bit in the commit
> > about changing the permissions of kallsyms after boot, but if I can't
> > boot that doesn't help. Perhaps this can be made a configuration
> > option?
>
> It's not worth a config option.
>
> If it actually breaks user-space, I think we should just revert it.
User space klogd is what's broken in this case:
ksyms = fopen(KSYMS, "r");
if ( ksyms == NULL )
{
if ( errno == ENOENT )
Syslog(LOG_INFO, "No module symbols loaded - "
"kernel modules not enabled.\n");
else
Syslog(LOG_ERR, "Error loading kernel symbols " \
"- %s\n", strerror(errno));
fclose(ksyms);
return(0);
}
The fclose(NULL) is a bug, as I don't think the standards require
that to be handled gracefully.
> It's kind of sad to default to the world-visible thing,
klogd also gets symbols from System.map, so /proc/kallsyms access
is not a strict requirement.
I haven't checked to see if klogd can work without a symbol source
at all, but I'll wager it can.
Regards,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists