[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimrgXbZxQKjapXkDgYRZqdZkfe1eUdFTAu=+Q8f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:11:14 -0800
From: Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Benchmarks of kernel tracing options (ftrace and ktrace)
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Mike may have been confused ;-)
I am always confused.
> I did tell him that some ring buffer improvements did make it into the
> kernel. You might want to try the latest mainline again.
You told me that you had patches (in 2.6.37) I think that would allow
us to specifically improve the syscall tracing performance.
Can you point us at em?
mrubin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists