[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CE708AA.7030405@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:30:50 -0600
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 0/6] x86, NMI: give NMI handler a face-lift
On 11/19/2010 05:09 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:59 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
>>
>> @@ -1371,6 +1385,12 @@ void __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>>
>> pmu_check_apic();
>>
>> + /* sanity check that the hardware exists or is emulated */
>> + if (!check_hw_exists()) {
>> + pr_cont("no PMU driver, software events only.\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>
> Maybe report something like this:
> "Broken PMU hardware detected, software events only."
>
> Because this is really not something that's supposed to happen.
The kgdb test suite is passing with Don's perf detect logic, so we are
back to good. I am in agreement with Peter about the message
indicating that it is broken hardware. We don't in any way shape or
form want leave the illusion this works in the VM.
# dmesg |grep Per
<6>Performance Events: no PMU driver, software events only.
Tested on qemu and kvm, several revisions worth, because it is all
automated.
Tested-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Thanks,
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists