linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] x86: add numa=possible command line option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101121142615.GI9099@hack>
Date:	Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:26:15 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...el.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86: add numa=possible command line option


Hi, David

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 06:28:31PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>Adds a numa=possible=<N> command line option to set an additional N nodes
>as being possible for memory hotplug.  This set of possible nodes
>controls nr_node_ids and the sizes of several dynamically allocated node
>arrays.
>
>This allows memory hotplug to create new nodes for newly added memory
>rather than binding it to existing nodes.
>
>The first use-case for this will be node hotplug emulation which will use
>these possible nodes to create new nodes to test the memory hotplug
>callbacks and surrounding memory hotplug code.
>


I am not sure how much value of making this dynamic,
for CPU, we do this at compile time, i.e. NR_CPUS,
so how about NR_NODES?

Also, numa=possible= is not as clear as numa=max=, for me at least.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/