[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikjz3j4j-zLSzagF=wnVE1ROZBGsjtuhGEvB9=n@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 09:56:17 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, eparis@...hat.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.2 0/5] IMA: making i_readcount a first class inode
citizen (reposting)
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> IMA (and the proposed EVM/IMA-appraisal patches) detects file change
> based on i_version. When the file is closed, if the file has changed,
> IMA marks the file as needing to be re-measured. Of course this requires
> the filesystem to be mounted with iversion. Don't know if this helps.
If you only do this at close time, I see a _major_ security hole.
The attacker can just write to the file, and keep it open. Ta-daa,
everybody who reads it sees the new contents, but your IMA logic is
oblivious and thinks it doesn't need to be re-measured.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists