[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290298745.5559.12.camel@maggy.simson.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:19:05 -0700
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Mika Laitio <lamikr@...ppa.org>
Cc: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 00:16 +0200, Mika Laitio wrote:
> > > What complexity? Have you looked at the patch? It has no complexity anywhere.
> > >
> > > It's a _lot_ less complex than having system daemons you don't
> > > control. We have not had good results with that approach in the past.
> > > System daemons tend to cause nasty problems, and debugging them is a
> > > nightmare.
> >
> > Well, userspace doesn't bite.
>
> To me, this starts sounding like a legendary "userspace suspend" versus
> "kernel suspend" support fights many years ago...
Nah. Patch accepted, rejected, obsoleted 10 minutes from now etc etc,
it'll never be a big deal.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists