[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CEA4334.5070106@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:17:24 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: MMU: abstract invalid guest pte mapping
On 11/22/2010 12:18 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >
> > I think the order is reversed. If !is_present_gpte(), it doesn't matter
> > if reserved bits are set or not.
> >
>
> if !is_present_gpte()&& is_rsvd_bits_set, then we may mark the spte notrap,
> so the guest will detect #PF with PFEC.P=PEFC.RSVD=0, but the appropriate PFEC
> is PFEC.P=0&& PEFC.RSVD=1 ?
I think the correct PFEC is .P = .RSVD = 0, but best to check on real
hardware to be sure.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists