lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CEA4334.5070106@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:17:24 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: MMU: abstract invalid guest pte mapping

On 11/22/2010 12:18 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >
> >  I think the order is reversed.  If !is_present_gpte(), it doesn't matter
> >  if reserved bits are set or not.
> >
>
> if !is_present_gpte()&&  is_rsvd_bits_set, then we may mark the spte notrap,
> so the guest will detect #PF with PFEC.P=PEFC.RSVD=0, but the appropriate PFEC
> is PFEC.P=0&&  PEFC.RSVD=1 ?

I think the correct PFEC is .P = .RSVD = 0, but best to check on real 
hardware to be sure.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ