[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101122123050.GA5385@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:30:50 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Backlight: Add backlight type
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:17:00AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> I also want to make sure you think this patch is going to scale with
> multiple GPU output machines? Thats the main reason I've held off any
> patch like this as it doesn't help solve that problem as far as I can
> tell. Yes, we have the device parent information and I see later in the
> patch series you ensure the backlight is registered against the
> connector which is good. If you have an ACPI "firmware" control that you
> say should always be preferred, how do we know which connector device
> that corresponds to in the multiple output case? From that point of view
> this model falls apart?
The ACPI device will point at the correct PCI device. Associating it
with the appropriate connector is theoretically possible in the case of
open drivers, but I hadn't seen it as a high priority since (in
practice) there's no situations where an ACPI interface will be able to
control more than one backlight.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists